The Queensland mental health court: a unique model
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Upgrading community treatment through a mental health court
Methods The sample is 65 persons, co-morbid with substance abuse and severe mental illness, who volunteered for mental health court after conviction of a felony or serious misdemeanor over a four-year period. Their jail days, hospital days, and arrests and convictions post-MHC are compared to their history over a comparable period prior to entry. Outcomes of graduates are compared to those disc...
متن کاملDefendants with intellectual disabilities and mental health diagnoses: faring in a mental health court.
BACKGROUND Begun in the late 1990s, mental health courts are specialty criminal courts developed to address the needs of persons with mental illness. METHODS As many persons with intellectual disabilities (IDs) may overlap in the mental health court system, we used mental health court records to examine the phenomenology and outcomes of 224 defendants with and without co-occurring IDs in the ...
متن کاملObservations of reintegrative shaming in a mental health court.
This study compares the use of stigmatizing and reintegrative shame - as specified in Braithwaite's Crime, shame and reintegration (1989) - across traditional criminal court and mental health court settings. Items from the Global Observational Ratings Instrument were used to gather data on 87 traditional court cases and 91 mental health court cases, presided over by five different judges. The o...
متن کاملThe use of mental health court appearances in supervision.
A defining feature of mental health courts (MHCs) is the requirement that enrollees appear periodically for status review hearings before the MHC judge. Although the research base on these specialty courts is growing, MHC appearances have yet to be examined. In the present study, the authors followed more than 400 MHC clients from four courts. We examined the number of court appearances that we...
متن کاملMental health courts and the lesson learned in juvenile court.
Justice Fortas in this quotation was addressing the extent of procedural due process provided in juvenile proceedings in 1966. Well-meaning members of the criminal justice system had developed a court process intent on helping juveniles, rather than punishing them as criminal offenders. Since there was no criminal adjudication, and anonymity was generally assured, it was believed that the nicet...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BJPsych International
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2056-4740,2058-6264
DOI: 10.1192/bji.2019.11